Miner intelligence

Miner Jurisdiction Risk

Understand where mining companies operate and the political, regulatory, security, and sovereign risks surrounding their assets.

Jurisdiction risk describes where a miner's operations and reserves are exposed. It is separate from Grey Rabbit's valuation methodology and does not automatically imply a valuation adjustment.

Structural jurisdiction risk — longer-term country classification from reviewed evidence.

Current event pressure — near-term monitored developments. Headlines do not automatically rewrite structural ratings.

Methodology →·Run Valuation →·Compare Miners·Mining 50

Miner selector

Company

Map filters

Interactive world map

Country fill = structural risk · Outline = current event pressure · Dot = mine / asset

Elevated+ prod: 26%High/Severe prod: 8%Countries: 10

On smaller screens, use the exposure summary and country list first. The map remains available for exploration.

Country fill · Structural risk

LowModerateElevatedHighSevereUnknown

Outline · Current pressure

WatchElevatedCritical

Marker · Asset stage

ProducingDevelopmentCare & maintenance

Markers use disclosed coordinates. Overlaps are offset slightly — not dropped.

Country list

Structural risk reviewed: 2026-02-19Monitoring updated: Unavailable

Jurisdiction table

Same filtered portfolio as the map — structural risk, current pressure, assets, ownership/stage.

Jurisdiction	Structural risk	Current pressure	Assets	Ownership / stage
Argentina	Elevated	NORMAL	Cerro Negro	Cerro Negro 100% producing
Australia	Low	NORMAL	Cadia, Boddington, Tanami	Cadia, Boddington, Tanami 100% producing
Canada	Low	NORMAL	Brucejack, Red Chris	Brucejack 100% producing · Red Chris 70% producing
Dominican Republic	Moderate	NORMAL	Pueblo Viejo	Pueblo Viejo 40% producing
Ghana	Moderate	NORMAL	Ahafo South, Ahafo Complex, Ahafo North	Ahafo South, Ahafo Complex, Ahafo North 100% producing
Mexico	Elevated	NORMAL	Peñasquito	Peñasquito 100% producing
Papua New Guinea	High	NORMAL	Lihir, Wafi-Golpu	Lihir 100% producing · Wafi-Golpu 50% development
Peru	Elevated	NORMAL	Yanacocha	Yanacocha 100% producing
Suriname	Elevated	NORMAL	Merian	Merian 75% producing
United States	Low	NORMAL	Nevada Gold Mines, Carlin Complex, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix	Nevada Gold Mines, Carlin Complex, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix 38.5% producing

Selected miner exposure

Newmont Corporation (NEM)

Newmont Corporation has meaningful exposure to both lower-risk jurisdictions and higher-risk jurisdictions including Papua New Guinea.

Countries of operation

Producing assets

Development assets

Company jurisdiction score

69 / 100 · Moderate risk · weighted by PRODUCTION

Weighted from numeric scores only

Production exposure by jurisdiction

Based on attributable gold production for 19 of 20 assets in this dataset (not necessarily 100% of company-reported production)

Reserve exposure by jurisdiction

Grey Rabbit Pro

Unlock Exposure Analytics

See reserve exposure distribution, risk-category shares, and deeper provenance for this miner’s jurisdictions.

Start Grey Rabbit Pro Sign in

Asset coverage: 19/20 with attributable production · 9/20 with attributable reserves · Last source date: 2026-02-19

Jurisdiction breakdown

Select a country on the map or exposure list to inspect risk dimensions and sources.

Mine / project details

Select a mine marker to view ownership, commodities, and provenance.

Current risk developments

Monitored factual events with source tier + corroboration — not AI headline sentiment. Structural ratings do not change automatically from these cards.

MXElevatedmonitoring

Mexico mining concession / law reforms

Federal mining-law and concession reforms have increased permitting and tenure uncertainty for Mexican mining assets.

Published: 2024-06-01 · Affected: NEM, AEM, PAAS

PEElevatedmonitoring

Peru community protest / blockade risk

Recurring community protests and transport blockades remain a structural social-license risk for Peruvian mining operations.

Published: 2025-09-01 · Affected: NEM, PAAS

Recent jurisdiction changes

Approved structural rating history only — never invented.

No approved structural risk changes yet.

Methodology & limitations

· Structural risk and current event pressure are separate.
· Events may create review proposals; they never silently rewrite structural ratings.
· Source tiers 1–4; Tier 4 cannot independently publish a structural change.
· Jurisdiction remains informational — no valuation haircut.

Full methodology →